ACV vs TCV

Published by 4NLab · Updated · Our methods

ACV normalizes recurring contract value to one year, while TCV captures the full included commitment across the term. They are useful together because a larger booking can come from a longer term, a higher recurring price, or a one-time fee. Those changes have different implications for the business.

Key differences

QuestionACVTCV
What time scale?One annualized year of recurring fees under this guide’s convention.The full committed contract term.
Are one-time fees included?Excluded here; disclose if your company uses another convention.Included when they are part of the contract value.
What comparison does it support?Recurring deal size across different contract durations.Total commitment, with term and payment schedule shown.

One scenario, two measures

Hypothetical worked scenario

A fictional customer signs a three-year agreement at $12,000 per year plus $2,000 onboarding. A second customer signs one year at $15,000 with no setup fee.

First contract: ACV $12,000 and TCV $38,000. Second contract: ACV $15,000 and TCV $15,000.

The first contract has the larger total commitment; the second has the larger annual recurring value. A sales ranking changes depending on the intended question.

Which should you use?

  • Use ACV when evaluating recurring deal size, acquisition economics, and segment mix. It prevents contract duration from dominating the comparison.
  • Use TCV when describing total signed commitment. Show cancellation rights and scheduled billing, because a multi-year booking may be collected over several years.
  • For ramped pricing, retain the annual fee schedule as well as average ACV. A first-year discount can make near-term revenue lower than the average annualized amount.

Where comparisons can mislead

  • Neither metric is a substitute for an accounting revenue schedule or a cash collection forecast.
  • Exclude optional renewals from committed TCV; model them separately as forecasts.

Explore the full guides: ACV and TCV.

Sources and methodology

The references below explain the underlying methods. Our worked scenarios use hypothetical figures; they are not company results or current market benchmarks.

Found an error or a definition that differs from your reporting? Send a correction with the page URL and the method you use.